Fardette v. . New York and Stamford Railway Company
135 N.E. 969, 233 N.Y. 660, 1922 N.Y. LEXIS 1084
This text of 135 N.E. 969 (Fardette v. . New York and Stamford Railway Company) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Fardette v. . New York and Stamford Railway Company, 135 N.E. 969, 233 N.Y. 660, 1922 N.Y. LEXIS 1084 (N.Y. 1922).
Opinion
Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.
Concur: His cock, Ch. J., Hogan, Cardozo, Pound, McLaughlin, Crane and Andrews, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
O'Leary v. American Airlines
100 A.D.2d 959 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1984)
Elsie Olsen, as Administratrix of the Goods, Chattels and Credits of Ingolf Olsen v. The New York Central Railroad Company
341 F.2d 233 (Second Circuit, 1965)
Longacre v. . Yonkers Railroad Co.
140 N.E. 215 (New York Court of Appeals, 1923)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
135 N.E. 969, 233 N.Y. 660, 1922 N.Y. LEXIS 1084, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/fardette-v-new-york-and-stamford-railway-company-ny-1922.