Farbro Corp. v. A. F. A. Realty Corp.
This text of 235 A.D. 683 (Farbro Corp. v. A. F. A. Realty Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
-Judgment affirmed, with costs. No opinion. Young, Kapper, Hagarty and Carswell, JJ., concur: Lazansky, P. J., dissents on the ground that section 586 of the Civil Practice Act does not apply to an action brought by a vendor who has obtained a judgment of specific performance nor to a case where it is brought to impress a vendee’s hen upon real estate that he contracted to buy.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
235 A.D. 683, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/farbro-corp-v-a-f-a-realty-corp-nyappdiv-1932.