Farber v. Value Rent-A-Car

546 So. 2d 129, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 1704, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 4047, 1989 WL 78314
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided July 18, 1989·No. No. 88-2271·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

A review of the record discloses the existence of a genuine issue of material fact concerning the question of foreseeability. The existence of this issue is sufficient to preclude the entry of a Summary Judgment. Moore v. Morris, 475 So.2d 666 (Fla.1985); Holl v. Talcott, 191 So.2d 40 (Fla.1966); and Shaffran v. Holness, 93 So.2d 94 (Fla.1957). This issue must be presented to, and resolved by, the trier-of-fact.

In addition, it is clear that the “Impact Rule” is inapplicable to the facts herein. Lowd v. Cal Kovens Construction Corp., 546 So.2d 1087 (Fla. 3d DCA 1989).

Accordingly, the Summary Judgment entered in this cause is reversed and this case is remanded for further proceedings consistent herewith.

Reversed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Farber v. Value Rent-A-Car, 546 So. 2d 129, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 1704, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 4047, 1989 WL 78314 (Fla. Ct. App. 1989).

546 So. 2d 129 (Farber v. Value Rent-A-Car) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Moore v. Morris
475 So. 2d 666 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1985)
Lowd v. CAL KOVENS CONST. CORP.
546 So. 2d 1087 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1989)
Shaffran v. Holness
93 So. 2d 94 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1957)