Farber v. Value Rent-A-Car

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Farber v. Value Rent-A-Car

546 So. 2d 129, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 1704, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 4047, 1989 WL 78314

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedJuly 18, 1989

DocketNo. 88-2271

StatusPublished

This text of 546 So. 2d 129 (Farber v. Value Rent-A-Car) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Farber v. Value Rent-A-Car, 546 So. 2d 129, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 1704, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 4047, 1989 WL 78314 (Fla. Ct. App. 1989).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

A review of the record discloses the existence of a genuine issue of material fact concerning the question of foreseeability. The existence of this issue is sufficient to preclude the entry of a Summary Judgment. Moore v. Morris, 475 So.2d 666 (Fla.1985); Holl v. Talcott, 191 So.2d 40 (Fla.1966); and Shaffran v. Holness, 93 So.2d 94 (Fla.1957). This issue must be presented to, and resolved by, the trier-of-fact.

In addition, it is clear that the “Impact Rule” is inapplicable to the facts herein. Lowd v. Cal Kovens Construction Corp., 546 So.2d 1087 (Fla. 3d DCA 1989).

Accordingly, the Summary Judgment entered in this cause is reversed and this case is remanded for further proceedings consistent herewith.

Reversed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI