Farber v. Smolack

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Farber v. Smolack

31 A.D.2d 651, 296 N.Y.S.2d 523, 1968 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2590

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedDecember 23, 1968

StatusPublished

This text of 31 A.D.2d 651 (Farber v. Smolack) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Farber v. Smolack, 31 A.D.2d 651, 296 N.Y.S.2d 523, 1968 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2590 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1968).

Pincite

Opinion

Order of the Supreme Court, Kings County, dated April 8, 1968, reversed, without costs, plaintiffs’ motion to set aside jury verdict in favor of defendant denied, and verdict reinstated. There was ample evidence to support a finding by the jury that there was no actionable negligence attributable to the driver of the ear. The trial court should not have set aside the verdict in favor of defendant (Winter v. Rickman, 26 A D 2d 842; Kalin v. Robert Catino, Inc., 20 A D 2d 549; Pertofsky v. Drucks, 16 A D 2d 690). Christ, Acting P. J., Brennan, Hopkins, Benjamin and Munder, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order of the Supreme Court, Kings County, dated April 8, 1968, reversed, without costs, plaintiffs’ motion to set aside jury verdict in favor of defendant denied, and verdict reinstated. There was ample evidence to support a finding by the jury that there was no actionable negligence attributable to the driver of the ear. The trial court should not have set aside the verdict in favor of defendant (Winter v. Rickman, 26 A D 2d 842; Kalin v. Robert Catino, Inc., 20 A D 2d 549; Pertofsky v. Drucks, 16 A D 2d 690). Christ, Acting P. J., Brennan, Hopkins, Benjamin and Munder, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

31 A.D.2d 651, 296 N.Y.S.2d 523, 1968 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2590, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/farber-v-smolack-nyappdiv-1968.