Home/Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York/Farber v. Demino

Farber v. Demino

228 A.D. 707
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedJanuary 15, 1930
StatusPublished

This text of 228 A.D. 707 (Farber v. Demino) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Farber v. Demino, 228 A.D. 707 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1930).

Opinion

Judgment and order affirmed, with costs, on authority of Post v. Stockwell (34 Hun, 373); Wands v. City of Schenectady (171 App. Div. 94), and Polsey v. Waldorf-Astoria, Inc. (216 id. 86). Young, Hagarty and Scudder, JJ., concur; Lazansky, P. J., and Rich, J., dissent, being of opinion that the verdict on this record, must be limited to $500. (Beal v. Finch, 11 N. Y. 128; Bonica v. Malone, 220 App. Div. 749.)

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Beal v. . Finch
11 N.Y. 128 (New York Court of Appeals, 1854)
Wands v. City of Schenectady
171 A.D. 94 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1916)
Bonica v. Malone
220 A.D. 749 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1927)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
228 A.D. 707, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/farber-v-demino-nyappdiv-1930.