Farber v. Demino

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Farber v. Demino

228 A.D. 707

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided January 15, 1930·Published

Opinion

Judgment and order affirmed, with costs, on authority of Post v. Stockwell (34 Hun, 373); Wands v. City of Schenectady (171 App. Div. 94), and Polsey v. Waldorf-Astoria, Inc. (216 id. 86). Young, Hagarty and Scudder, JJ., concur; Lazansky, P. J., and Rich, J., dissent, being of opinion that the verdict on this record, must be limited to $500. (Beal v. Finch, 11 N. Y. 128; Bonica v. Malone, 220 App. Div. 749.)

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Judgment and order affirmed, with costs, on authority of Post v. Stockwell (34 Hun, 373); Wands v. City of Schenectady (171 App. Div. 94), and Polsey v. Waldorf-Astoria, Inc. (216 id. 86). Young, Hagarty and Scudder, JJ., concur; Lazansky, P. J., and Rich, J., dissent, being of opinion that the verdict on this record, must be limited to $500. (Beal v. Finch, 11 N. Y. 128; Bonica v. Malone, 220 App. Div. 749.)

Farber v. Demino, 228 A.D. 707 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1930).

Pincite

228 A.D. 707 (Farber v. Demino) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related