Farber v. City of Utica

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Farber v. City of Utica

28 A.D.3d 1198, 813 N.Y.S.2d 689

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedApril 28, 2006

StatusPublished

This text of 28 A.D.3d 1198 (Farber v. City of Utica) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Farber v. City of Utica, 28 A.D.3d 1198, 813 N.Y.S.2d 689 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2006).

Pincite

Opinion

Appeal from a judgment (denominated order) of the Supreme Court, Oneida County (John G. Ringrose, A.J.), entered April 27, 2005. The judgment denied petitioner’s motion to dismiss the counterclaim and granted respondents’ cross motion for summary judgment on the counterclaim.

It is hereby ordered that the judgment so appealed from be and the same hereby is unanimously affirmed without costs. Present—Scudder, J.P., Kehoe, Smith, Green and Pine, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal from a judgment (denominated order) of the Supreme Court, Oneida County (John G. Ringrose, A.J.), entered April 27, 2005. The judgment denied petitioner’s motion to dismiss the counterclaim and granted respondents’ cross motion for summary judgment on the counterclaim.

It is hereby ordered that the judgment so appealed from be and the same hereby is unanimously affirmed without costs. Present—Scudder, J.P., Kehoe, Smith, Green and Pine, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

28 A.D.3d 1198, 813 N.Y.S.2d 689, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/farber-v-city-of-utica-nyappdiv-2006.