Farber v. City of Utica

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Farber v. City of Utica

28 A.D.3d 1198, 813 N.Y.S.2d 689

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided April 28, 2006·Published

Opinion

Appeal from a judgment (denominated order) of the Supreme Court, Oneida County (John G. Ringrose, A.J.), entered April 27, 2005. The judgment denied petitioner’s motion to dismiss the counterclaim and granted respondents’ cross motion for summary judgment on the counterclaim.

It is hereby ordered that the judgment so appealed from be and the same hereby is unanimously affirmed without costs. Present—Scudder, J.P., Kehoe, Smith, Green and Pine, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal from a judgment (denominated order) of the Supreme Court, Oneida County (John G. Ringrose, A.J.), entered April 27, 2005. The judgment denied petitioner’s motion to dismiss the counterclaim and granted respondents’ cross motion for summary judgment on the counterclaim.

It is hereby ordered that the judgment so appealed from be and the same hereby is unanimously affirmed without costs. Present—Scudder, J.P., Kehoe, Smith, Green and Pine, JJ.

Farber v. City of Utica, 28 A.D.3d 1198, 813 N.Y.S.2d 689 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2006).

Pincite

28 A.D.3d 1198 (Farber v. City of Utica) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.