Farash Construction Corp. v. Gregory D. Ferentino & Associates

167 A.D.2d 877, 561 N.Y.S.2d 974, 1990 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 14436
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided November 16, 1990·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Order unanimously affirmed without costs. Memorandum: Plaintiffs cause of action for fraudulent concealment [878] was properly dismissed. Defendant designed and supervised the construction of an apartment complex in 1970 and 1971. The complex was sold in 1974 and again in 1975 before plaintiff purchased the property in 1977. Following a fire in 1981, plaintiff alleged that defendant architect fraudulently concealed information that the complex was not constructed in accordance with accepted engineering and architectural standards. Plaintiff, however, has failed to allege or demonstrate a contractual, fiduciary or confidential relationship giving rise to a duty upon defendant to impart such information to plaintiff or upon which liability for fraud may be imposed (see generally, 60 NY Jur 2d, Fraud and Deceit, §§ 94-96; see also, Ossining Union Free School Dist. v Anderson LaRocca Anderson, 135 AD2d 518). (Appeal from order of Supreme Court, Monroe County, Willis, J.—summary judgment.) Present—Denman, J. P., Green, Balio, Lawton and Davis, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Farash Construction Corp. v. Gregory D. Ferentino & Associates, 167 A.D.2d 877, 561 N.Y.S.2d 974, 1990 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 14436 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1990).

167 A.D.2d 877 (Farash Construction Corp. v. Gregory D. Ferentino & Associates) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Cinque v. Schieferstein
292 A.D.2d 197 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2002)