Faraon v. Holder
This text of 471 F. App'x 733 (Faraon v. Holder) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
MEMORANDUM
Because Faraón did not argue before the BIA that he attempted to withdraw or should have been allowed to withdraw his concession to the charge of removability, we have no jurisdiction to consider his petition. See Barron v. Ashcroft, 358 F.3d 674, 678 (9th Cir.2004).
DISMISSED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
471 F. App'x 733, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/faraon-v-holder-ca9-2012.