Farah v. Gonzales
This text of 123 F. App'x 821 (Farah v. Gonzales) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
MEMORANDUM
Petitioner Jamal Farah challenges the Board of Immigration Appeal’s affirmance without opinion of the immigration judge’s adverse credibility finding and denial of asylum relief, withholding of removal, and protection under the Convention Against [822]*822Torture. Farah’s claims fail because substantial evidence supports the immigration judge’s determination that Farah was not credible. See Farah v. Ashcroft, 348 F.3d 1153, 1156 (9th Cir.2003) (explaining the standard for reviewing credibility findings).
PETITION DENIED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
123 F. App'x 821, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/farah-v-gonzales-ca9-2005.