Farah v. Emirates
Opinion
USDC SDNY UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DOCUMENT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK ELECTRONICALLY FILED . X DOC #: — DATE FILED: 10/13/2021 KAYENAT FARAH, et al., : Plaintiffs, : -against- : 21-CV-5786 (VSB) EMIRATES et al., : ORDER Defendants. :
wane eK
VERNON S. BRODERICK, United States District Judge: On October 12, 2021, Plaintiffs filed an amended complaint pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 15(a)(1)(B). “[W]hen a plaintiff properly amends [a] complaint after a defendant has filed a motion to dismiss that is still pending, the district court has the option of either denying the pending motion as moot or evaluating the motion in light of the facts alleged in the amended complaint.” Pettaway v. Nat’l Recovery Sols., LLC, 955 F.3d 299, 303-04 (2d Cir. 2020). Accordingly, it is hereby: ORDERED that Defendants shall file a letter within seven (7) days deciding whether their motion to dismiss should be deemed moot without prejudice to refile a new motion to dismiss in accordance with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 15(a)(3), or if I should evaluate Defendants’ current motion to dismiss in light of the facts alleged in the amended complaint. SO ORDERED. Dated: October 13, 2021 fh | 2 s New York, New York SAMUS és Vernon S. Broderick United States District Judge
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Farah v. Emirates (Farah v. Emirates) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.