Farah Manufacturing Co. v. National Labor Relations Board

Fifth Circuit

Farah Manufacturing Co. v. National Labor Relations Board

450 F.2d 942

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

DecidedOctober 13, 1971

DocketNos. 71-1097, 71-1688

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 450 F.2d 942 (Farah Manufacturing Co. v. National Labor Relations Board) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Farah Manufacturing Co. v. National Labor Relations Board, 450 F.2d 942 (5th Cir. 1971).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

There is substantial evidence on the record as a whole to support the Board’s conclusion that the company violated Sections 8(a) (1) and (3) of the Act by interrogating and then discharging an employee, and by promulgating and maintaining plant rules prohibiting solicitation, distribution and access to other areas, Universal Camera Corp. v. N. L. R. B., 340 U.S. 474, 71 S.Ct. 456, 95 L.Ed. 456 (1951), and it appears that the Board did not improperly apply the standards set forth in N. L. R. B. v. Babcock & Wilcox Co., 351 U.S. 105, 76 S.Ct. 679, 100 L.Ed. 975 (1956), in determining that the company did not violate Section 8(a) (1) of the Act by denying non-employee organizees access to its premises.

Enforced.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

There is substantial evidence on the record as a whole to support the Board’s conclusion that the company violated Sections 8(a) (1) and (3) of the Act by interrogating and then discharging an employee, and by promulgating and maintaining plant rules prohibiting solicitation, distribution and access to other areas, Universal Camera Corp. v. N. L. R. B., 340 U.S. 474, 71 S.Ct. 456, 95 L.Ed. 456 (1951), and it appears that the Board did not improperly apply the standards set forth in N. L. R. B. v. Babcock & Wilcox Co., 351 U.S. 105, 76 S.Ct. 679, 100 L.Ed. 975 (1956), in determining that the company did not violate Section 8(a) (1) of the Act by denying non-employee organizees access to its premises.

Enforced.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

450 F.2d 942, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/farah-manufacturing-co-v-national-labor-relations-board-ca5-1971.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack