Farach v. Wells Fargo Bank

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Farach v. Wells Fargo Bank

116 So. 3d 570, 2013 WL 3014286, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 9618

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedJune 19, 2013

DocketNo. 3D12-395

StatusPublished

This text of 116 So. 3d 570 (Farach v. Wells Fargo Bank) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Farach v. Wells Fargo Bank, 116 So. 3d 570, 2013 WL 3014286, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 9618 (Fla. Ct. App. 2013).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See, e.g., Dage v. Deutsche Bank Nat’l Trust Co., 95 So.3d 1021 (Fla. 2d DCA 2012) (holding that a bank’s alleged lack of standing at the time it filed a foreclosure action did not render default judgment void); accord Phadael v. Deutsche Bank Trust Co. Ams., 83 So.3d 893 (Fla. 4th DCA 2012); see also Stratton v. 6000 Indian Creek, LLC, 95 So.3d 334, 336 (Fla. 3d DCA 2012) (recognizing that the issue of standing is an affirmative defense that can be waived).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See, e.g., Dage v. Deutsche Bank Nat’l Trust Co., 95 So.3d 1021 (Fla. 2d DCA 2012) (holding that a bank’s alleged lack of standing at the time it filed a foreclosure action did not render default judgment void); accord Phadael v. Deutsche Bank Trust Co. Ams., 83 So.3d 893 (Fla. 4th DCA 2012); see also Stratton v. 6000 Indian Creek, LLC, 95 So.3d 334, 336 (Fla. 3d DCA 2012) (recognizing that the issue of standing is an affirmative defense that can be waived).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

116 So. 3d 570, 2013 WL 3014286, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 9618, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/farach-v-wells-fargo-bank-fladistctapp-2013.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack