Farabaugh v. Pennsylvania Turnpike Commission
882 A.2d 1003, 584 Pa. 160, 2005 Pa. LEXIS 1866
CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania
DecidedSeptember 1, 2005
DocketPetition 640 WAL 2004
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases
This text of 882 A.2d 1003 (Farabaugh v. Pennsylvania Turnpike Commission) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Farabaugh v. Pennsylvania Turnpike Commission, 882 A.2d 1003, 584 Pa. 160, 2005 Pa. LEXIS 1866 (Pa. 2005).
Opinion
*161 ORDER
AND NOW, this 1st day of September, 2005, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is hereby granted, limited to the following issues:
1. Whether guidance by the Supreme Court is necessary because the scope of a construction manager’s duty to a contractor’s employee is an issue of first impression in the Commonwealth?
3. Whether the Commonwealth Court erroneously held that the Pennsylvania Turnpike Commission had a common law duty to warn the decedent’s employer of any obvious conditions created by the general contractor?
The Pennsylvania Turnpike Commission’s Application for Leave to File Post-Submission Communication is denied as moot.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Farabaugh v. Pennsylvania Turnpike Commission
911 A.2d 1264 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 2006)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
882 A.2d 1003, 584 Pa. 160, 2005 Pa. LEXIS 1866, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/farabaugh-v-pennsylvania-turnpike-commission-pa-2005.