Far East Co. v. United States

20 Cust. Ct. 318, 1948 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 273
CourtUnited States Customs Court
DecidedMay 14, 1948
DocketNo. 52324; protests 87095-K, etc. (San Francisco)
StatusPublished

This text of 20 Cust. Ct. 318 (Far East Co. v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Customs Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Far East Co. v. United States, 20 Cust. Ct. 318, 1948 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 273 (cusc 1948).

Opinion

Opinion by

Oliver, P. J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that certain items of the merchandise are similar in all material respects to the articles the subject of Rolls Razor, Inc. v. United States (6 Cust. Ct. 271, C. D. 480) and Abstract 51306 the claim at 20 percent under paragraph 1558 was sustained. Kumquats stipulated to be the same as those involved in United States v. Fung Chong Co. (34 C. C. P. A. 40, C. A. D. 342) were held properly dutiable at 1 cent per pound under paragraph 743 as oranges.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Rolls Razor, Inc. v. United States
6 Cust. Ct. 271 (U.S. Customs Court, 1941)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
20 Cust. Ct. 318, 1948 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 273, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/far-east-co-v-united-states-cusc-1948.