Faoutas v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Faoutas v. State

745 So. 2d 398, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 13676, 1999 WL 821265

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedOctober 15, 1999

DocketNo. 98-3169

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 745 So. 2d 398 (Faoutas v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Faoutas v. State, 745 So. 2d 398, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 13676, 1999 WL 821265 (Fla. Ct. App. 1999).

Pincite

Opinion

MINER, J.

Here we review the trial court’s denial of appellant’s petition for a writ of habeas corpus testing what the trial judge describes as an “informal policy” regarding the refusal by some first appearance magistrates in Leon County to modify a “bail” amount endorsed by another judge on an arrest warrant without the consent of that judge.

Although the issue is moot with respect to the appellant, we address the matter because it involves an unwritten policy or practice that the trial court describes as one that “obviously changes from time to time depending on the judges involved.”

The precise issue involved here was recently addressed by our sister court in Norris v. State, 737 So.2d 1240 (Fla. 5th DCA 1999). We concur in the reasoning set forth in the majority’s opinion in Norris and therefore reverse and remand with directions that such unwritten policy or practice be discontinued. Although not before us at the moment, the same result [399]*399would obtain even if such policy was reduced to an administrative order.

REVERSED and REMANDED.

BOOTH and VAN NORTWICK, JJ., CONCUR.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI