Fantroyal v. Hiers
This text of 316 S.E.2d 40 (Fantroyal v. Hiers) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Slip and Fall. Based upon the facts of record in this case, the issues raised on appeal are controlled adversely to appellant by the decisions in Sears, Roebuck & Co. v. Reid, 132 Ga. App. 136 (207 SE2d 532) (1974), and Gibson v. Consolidated Credit Corp., 110 Ga. App. 170 (138 SE2d 77) (1964). See also Alterman Foods, Inc. v. Ligon, 246 Ga. 620 (272 SE2d 327) (1980); Key v. J. C. Penney Co., 165 [799]*799Ga. App. 176 (299 SE2d 895) (1983); Winn-Dixie Stores, Inc. v. Hardy, 138 Ga. App. 342 (4) (226 SE2d 142) (1976). The case relied upon by appellant, Weight Watchers of Greater Atlanta v. Welborn, 165 Ga. App. 290 (299 SE2d 760) (1983), is factually distinguishable from the case at bar.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
316 S.E.2d 40, 169 Ga. App. 798, 1984 Ga. App. LEXIS 1716, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/fantroyal-v-hiers-gactapp-1984.