Fantroy v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Fantroy v. State

463 S.W.3d 798, 2015 WL 848631

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided February 24, 2015·No. No. ED 100990·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM

Anton Fantroy appeals the judgment of the Circuit Court of the City of St. Louis denying his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief. We affirm the motion court’s judgment.

No error of law appears. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM

Anton Fantroy appeals the judgment of the Circuit Court of the City of St. Louis denying his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief. We affirm the motion court’s judgment.

No error of law appears. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Fantroy v. State, 463 S.W.3d 798, 2015 WL 848631 (Mo. Ct. App. 2015).

Pincite

463 S.W.3d 798 (Fantroy v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.