Fante v. Philadelphia Transportation Co.
This text of 294 A.2d 776 (Fante v. Philadelphia Transportation Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Opinion
It is settled law that the mere appeal of one defendant in compulsory arbitration is of no avail to another defendant, so that a judgment entered after the lapse of appeal time will not be opened or stricken. Flouders v. Foster, 212 Pa. Superior Ct. 418, 243 A. 2d 146 (1968). Appellant, therefore, is not entitled to the relief he seeks.
Appellant states that execution on the judgment may subject him to greater liability than the law provides for a joint tort-feasor, if it is determined in the existing appeal that the other tort-feasor had a valid release. The question of whether execution should be stayed was not before the court below and is not properly before us.1
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
294 A.2d 776, 222 Pa. Super. 276, 1972 Pa. Super. LEXIS 1276, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/fante-v-philadelphia-transportation-co-pa-1972.