Fantasia v. HESS OIL & CHEMICAL CORPORATION

New Jersey Superior Court App Division

Fantasia v. HESS OIL & CHEMICAL CORPORATION

273 A.2d 402, 113 N.J. Super. 229

CourtNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division

DecidedFebruary 5, 1971

StatusPublished

This text of 273 A.2d 402 (Fantasia v. HESS OIL & CHEMICAL CORPORATION) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Fantasia v. HESS OIL & CHEMICAL CORPORATION, 273 A.2d 402, 113 N.J. Super. 229 (N.J. Ct. App. 1971).

Pincite

Opinion

113 N.J. Super. 229 (1971) 273 A.2d 402

LARAINE FANTASIA, PETITIONER-APPELLANT,
v.
HESS OIL & CHEMICAL CORPORATION, NOW HESS OIL & CHEMICAL DIV., AMERADA HESS CORPORATION, RESPONDENT-RESPONDENT.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Argued February 1, 1971. Decided February 5, 1971.

Before Judges GOLDMANN, LEONARD and MOUNTAIN.

Mr. John M. Strichek argued the cause for appellant (Messrs. Waters & McPherson, attorneys).

Mr. James A. Robottom argued the cause for respondent (Messrs. Haskins, Robottom & Hack, attorneys).

PER CURIAM.

We affirm essentially for the reasons stated in the opinion of County Judge Arnold, reported at 110 N.J. Super. 360 (1970).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

113 N.J. Super. 229 (1971) 273 A.2d 402

LARAINE FANTASIA, PETITIONER-APPELLANT,
v.
HESS OIL & CHEMICAL CORPORATION, NOW HESS OIL & CHEMICAL DIV., AMERADA HESS CORPORATION, RESPONDENT-RESPONDENT.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Argued February 1, 1971. Decided February 5, 1971.

Before Judges GOLDMANN, LEONARD and MOUNTAIN.

Mr. John M. Strichek argued the cause for appellant (Messrs. Waters & McPherson, attorneys).

Mr. James A. Robottom argued the cause for respondent (Messrs. Haskins, Robottom & Hack, attorneys).

PER CURIAM.

We affirm essentially for the reasons stated in the opinion of County Judge Arnold, reported at 110 N.J. Super. 360 (1970).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

273 A.2d 402, 113 N.J. Super. 229, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/fantasia-v-hess-oil-chemical-corporation-njsuperctappdiv-1971.

Opinion

LARAINE FANTASIA, PETITIONER-APPELLANT, v. HESS OIL & CHEMICAL CORPORATION, NOW HESS OIL & CHEMICAL DIV., AMERADA HESS CORPORATION, RESPONDENT-RESPONDENT.

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

LARAINE FANTASIA, PETITIONER-APPELLANT,
v.
HESS OIL & CHEMICAL CORPORATION, NOW HESS OIL & CHEMICAL DIV., AMERADA HESS CORPORATION, RESPONDENT-RESPONDENT.