Fantasia v. HESS OIL & CHEMICAL CORPORATION

273 A.2d 402, 113 N.J. Super. 229
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division·Decided February 5, 1971·Published

Opinion

113 N.J. Super. 229 (1971)
273 A.2d 402

LARAINE FANTASIA, PETITIONER-APPELLANT,
v.
HESS OIL & CHEMICAL CORPORATION, NOW HESS OIL & CHEMICAL DIV., AMERADA HESS CORPORATION, RESPONDENT-RESPONDENT.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Argued February 1, 1971.
Decided February 5, 1971.

Before Judges GOLDMANN, LEONARD and MOUNTAIN.

Mr. John M. Strichek argued the cause for appellant (Messrs. Waters & McPherson, attorneys).

Mr. James A. Robottom argued the cause for respondent (Messrs. Haskins, Robottom & Hack, attorneys).

PER CURIAM.

We affirm essentially for the reasons stated in the opinion of County Judge Arnold, reported at 110 N.J. Super. 360 (1970).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Fantasia v. HESS OIL & CHEMICAL CORPORATION, 273 A.2d 402, 113 N.J. Super. 229 (N.J. Ct. App. 1971).

273 A.2d 402 (Fantasia v. HESS OIL & CHEMICAL CORPORATION) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Fantasia v. Hess Oil and Chemical Corp.
265 A.2d 565 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1970)