Fant v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.

Fourth Circuit

Fant v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.

633 F. App'x 196

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided February 29, 2016·No. No. 15-2309·Published

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Annie Fant appeals the district court’s order dismissing her complaint under Fed. R.Civ.P. 12(b)(6). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Fant v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., No. 3:15-cv-00474-JAG, 2015 WL 5841383 (E.D.Va. Oct. 7, 2015). We grant Fant’s motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis, but deny as moot her motion to expedite the decision. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Annie Fant appeals the district court’s order dismissing her complaint under Fed. R.Civ.P. 12(b)(6). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Fant v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., No. 3:15-cv-00474-JAG, 2015 WL 5841383 (E.D.Va. Oct. 7, 2015). We grant Fant’s motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis, but deny as moot her motion to expedite the decision. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Fant v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., 633 F. App'x 196 (4th Cir. 2016).

Pincite

633 F. App'x 196 (Fant v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.