Fant v. Mayer

250 A.D.2d 355, 672 N.Y.S.2d 684, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5252
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided May 5, 1998·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

—Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Emily Goodman, J.), entered on or about March 28, 1997, which, insofar as appealed from, granted defendant-respondent’s motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint as against her, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

None of the Industrial Code provisions invoked by plaintiff, namely, 12 NYCRR 8-2.15 and 12 NYCRR former 16.2 (e), former 16.5 (a) and former 16.8 (d), require that trap doors be equipped with a movable railing when open, and the out-of-possession landlord cannot otherwise be held liable for an accident arising out of the negligent use of a trap door where, as here, there is no showing of any structural defect (see, Brown v Weinreb, 183 AD2d 562). Concur — Lerner, P. J., Nardelli, Wallach, Rubin and Mazzarelli, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Fant v. Mayer, 250 A.D.2d 355, 672 N.Y.S.2d 684, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5252 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1998).

250 A.D.2d 355 (Fant v. Mayer) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Baez v. Barnard College
22 Misc. 3d 312 (New York Supreme Court, 2008)
Conti v. Kimmel
255 A.D.2d 201 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1998)