Fant v. Brown

6 S.E. 937, 29 S.C. 598
Supreme Court of South Carolina·Decided July 5, 1888·No. No. 2269·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Opinion by

Mr. Justice McGowan,

Plaintiff, a married woman, executed her note and mortgage of land to defendant. Defendant sold this land under a power contained in the mortgage, and purchased this land. Thereupon plaintiff sought in this action to vacate this sale. Upon testimony taken before the Circuit Judge (Norton) in open court, he found that the note was given by plaintiff in September, 1885, for the purchase of two mules, bought by and for herself, and therefore that her note and mortgage were valid. On appeal to this court, these findings of fact and conclusons of law were approved and affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Fant v. Brown, 6 S.E. 937, 29 S.C. 598 (S.C. 1888).

6 S.E. 937 (Fant v. Brown) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Kuster v. Dickson
45 F. 91 (U.S. Circuit Court for the District of South Carolina, 1891)
Greig v. Smith
7 S.E. 610 (Supreme Court of South Carolina, 1888)