Fant v. Brown

6 S.E. 937, 29 S.C. 598
CourtSupreme Court of South Carolina
DecidedJuly 5, 1888
DocketNo. 2269
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 6 S.E. 937 (Fant v. Brown) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of South Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Fant v. Brown, 6 S.E. 937, 29 S.C. 598 (S.C. 1888).

Opinion

Opinion by

Mr. Justice McGowan,

Plaintiff, a married woman, executed her note and mortgage of land to defendant. Defendant sold this land under a power contained in the mortgage, and purchased this land. Thereupon plaintiff sought in this action to vacate this sale. Upon testimony taken before the Circuit Judge (Norton) in open court, he found that the note was given by plaintiff in September, 1885, for the purchase of two mules, bought by and for herself, and therefore that her note and mortgage were valid. On appeal to this court, these findings of fact and conclusons of law were approved and affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Kuster v. Dickson
45 F. 91 (U.S. Circuit Court for the District of South Carolina, 1891)
Greig v. Smith
7 S.E. 610 (Supreme Court of South Carolina, 1888)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
6 S.E. 937, 29 S.C. 598, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/fant-v-brown-sc-1888.