Fant v. Board of Trustees
552 N.E.2d 639, 50 Ohio St. 3d 72, 1990 Ohio LEXIS 141
Opinion
The judgment of the court of appeals is affirmed for the reason stated by that court in its journal entry: “R.C. 149.43(C) authorizes only ‘attorney fees,’ not compensation to pro se litigants.”
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Fant v. Board of Trustees, 552 N.E.2d 639, 50 Ohio St. 3d 72, 1990 Ohio LEXIS 141 (Ohio 1990).
552 N.E.2d 639 (Fant v. Board of Trustees) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
State ex rel. Ware v. Galonski
2024 Ohio 613 (Ohio Supreme Court, 2024)
State Ex Rel. Bothwell v. Bothwell, Unpublished Decision (8-6-1999)
Ohio Court of Appeals, 1999
State ex rel. Thomas v. Ohio State University
643 N.E.2d 126 (Ohio Supreme Court, 1994)
State ex rel. Thomas v. Ohio State Univ.
1994 Ohio 261 (Ohio Supreme Court, 1994)
Ingraham v. Ribar
608 N.E.2d 815 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 1992)
State ex rel. Fant v. Mengel
580 N.E.2d 1085 (Ohio Supreme Court, 1991)