Fanroth v. Falkner

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Fanroth v. Falkner

137 A.D.2d 581, 524 N.Y.S.2d 363, 1988 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 997

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided February 8, 1988·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

In an action for the partition of real property, the defendant appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Krausman, J.), entered June 16, 1987, which granted the plaintiffs’ motion for summary judgment.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

Contrary to the defendant’s contentions, the record reveals that he was afforded ample opportunity to interpose all relevant objections and defenses in opposition to the plaintiffs’ motion for summary judgment. Moreover, a review of the defendant’s conclusory opposing allegations establishes that the court properly granted summary judgment to the plaintiffs. Lawrence, J. P., Kunzeman, Kooper and Spatt, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In an action for the partition of real property, the defendant appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Krausman, J.), entered June 16, 1987, which granted the plaintiffs’ motion for summary judgment.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

Contrary to the defendant’s contentions, the record reveals that he was afforded ample opportunity to interpose all relevant objections and defenses in opposition to the plaintiffs’ motion for summary judgment. Moreover, a review of the defendant’s conclusory opposing allegations establishes that the court properly granted summary judgment to the plaintiffs. Lawrence, J. P., Kunzeman, Kooper and Spatt, JJ., concur.

Fanroth v. Falkner, 137 A.D.2d 581, 524 N.Y.S.2d 363, 1988 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 997 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1988).

Pincite

137 A.D.2d 581 (Fanroth v. Falkner) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related