Fanroth v. Falkner

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Fanroth v. Falkner

137 A.D.2d 581, 524 N.Y.S.2d 363, 1988 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 997

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedFebruary 8, 1988

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 137 A.D.2d 581 (Fanroth v. Falkner) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Fanroth v. Falkner, 137 A.D.2d 581, 524 N.Y.S.2d 363, 1988 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 997 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1988).

Pincite

Opinion

In an action for the partition of real property, the defendant appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Krausman, J.), entered June 16, 1987, which granted the plaintiffs’ motion for summary judgment.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

Contrary to the defendant’s contentions, the record reveals that he was afforded ample opportunity to interpose all relevant objections and defenses in opposition to the plaintiffs’ motion for summary judgment. Moreover, a review of the defendant’s conclusory opposing allegations establishes that the court properly granted summary judgment to the plaintiffs. Lawrence, J. P., Kunzeman, Kooper and Spatt, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In an action for the partition of real property, the defendant appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Krausman, J.), entered June 16, 1987, which granted the plaintiffs’ motion for summary judgment.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

Contrary to the defendant’s contentions, the record reveals that he was afforded ample opportunity to interpose all relevant objections and defenses in opposition to the plaintiffs’ motion for summary judgment. Moreover, a review of the defendant’s conclusory opposing allegations establishes that the court properly granted summary judgment to the plaintiffs. Lawrence, J. P., Kunzeman, Kooper and Spatt, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

137 A.D.2d 581, 524 N.Y.S.2d 363, 1988 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 997, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/fanroth-v-falkner-nyappdiv-1988.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack