Fanotto v. Inland Wetlands Commission of Seymour

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Fanotto v. Inland Wetlands Commission of Seymour

957 A.2d 869, 289 Conn. 908, 2008 Conn. LEXIS 373

Supreme Court of Connecticut·Decided September 5, 2008·No. SC 18221·Published

Opinion

The defendant’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 108 Conn. App. 235 (AC 28405), is granted, limited to the following issue:

“Did the Appellate Court properly determine that the trial court improperly concluded that there was adequate support in the record for the denial of the application to conduct regulated activities on the subject property?”

VERTEFEUILLE, J., did not participate in the consideration of or decision on this petition.

[909] Decided September 5, 2008 The Supreme Court docket number is SC 18221. Timothy J. Lee, in support of the petition. Matthew Ranelli, in opposition.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The defendant’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 108 Conn. App. 235 (AC 28405), is granted, limited to the following issue:

“Did the Appellate Court properly determine that the trial court improperly concluded that there was adequate support in the record for the denial of the application to conduct regulated activities on the subject property?”

VERTEFEUILLE, J., did not participate in the consideration of or decision on this petition.

[909] Decided September 5, 2008 The Supreme Court docket number is SC 18221. Timothy J. Lee, in support of the petition. Matthew Ranelli, in opposition.

Fanotto v. Inland Wetlands Commission of Seymour, 957 A.2d 869, 289 Conn. 908, 2008 Conn. LEXIS 373 (Colo. 2008).

Pincite

957 A.2d 869 (Fanotto v. Inland Wetlands Commission of Seymour) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related