Fanotto v. Inland Wetlands Commission of Seymour
957 A.2d 869, 289 Conn. 908, 2008 Conn. LEXIS 373
This text of 957 A.2d 869 (Fanotto v. Inland Wetlands Commission of Seymour) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Connecticut primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Fanotto v. Inland Wetlands Commission of Seymour, 957 A.2d 869, 289 Conn. 908, 2008 Conn. LEXIS 373 (Colo. 2008).
Opinion
The defendant’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 108 Conn. App. 235 (AC 28405), is granted, limited to the following issue:
“Did the Appellate Court properly determine that the trial court improperly concluded that there was adequate support in the record for the denial of the application to conduct regulated activities on the subject property?”
VERTEFEUILLE, J., did not participate in the consideration of or decision on this petition.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Fanotto v. Inland Wetlands Commission
947 A.2d 422 (Connecticut Appellate Court, 2008)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
957 A.2d 869, 289 Conn. 908, 2008 Conn. LEXIS 373, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/fanotto-v-inland-wetlands-commission-of-seymour-conn-2008.