Fanning v. Maggi

282 A.D. 1067, 126 N.Y.S.2d 551, 1953 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5841
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided December 28, 1953·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

In an action for brokerage commissions, defendant Maggi appeals from a judgment insofar as it is against him and in favor of plaintiff and from so much of an order as denies his motion to set aside the verdict, for a dismissal of the complaint or for a new trial. Judgment and order insofar as appealed from, unanimously affirmed, with costs. The judgment is supported by the proof, and any variance between the pleading and the proof may be disregarded as immaterial. (Civ. Prac. Act, § 434; cf. Thorne Neale & Go. v. New York So. Coal Term. Gorp., 270 App. Div. 816, affd. 295 N. Y. 977, and Slotnick v. Klein, 280 App. Div. 984.) Present — Nolan, P. J., Adel, Wenzel, MacCrate and Beldock, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Fanning v. Maggi, 282 A.D. 1067, 126 N.Y.S.2d 551, 1953 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5841 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1953).

282 A.D. 1067 (Fanning v. Maggi) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Falk v. Krumm
22 A.D.2d 911 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1964)
Falk v. Krumm
39 Misc. 2d 448 (New York Supreme Court, 1963)
Gaylen MacHinery Corporation v. Pitman-Moore Company
273 F.2d 340 (Second Circuit, 1959)