Fanning v. Andres
874 S.W.2d 506, 1994 Mo. App. LEXIS 398, 1994 WL 67139
Opinion
Plaintiffs’ filed a pleading which they labeled “Petition for Damages for Tortious Interference with Contracts.” The trial court sustained defendants’ motions to dismiss for failure to state a cause of action and dismissed the petition with prejudice.
No error of law appears. An opinion would have no precedential value. Rule 84.-16(b).
The trial court’s judgment is affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Fanning v. Andres, 874 S.W.2d 506, 1994 Mo. App. LEXIS 398, 1994 WL 67139 (Mo. Ct. App. 1994).
874 S.W.2d 506 (Fanning v. Andres) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.