Fannin v. State

630 So. 2d 230, 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 331, 1994 WL 20084
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedJanuary 28, 1994
DocketNo. 93-1072
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 630 So. 2d 230 (Fannin v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Fannin v. State, 630 So. 2d 230, 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 331, 1994 WL 20084 (Fla. Ct. App. 1994).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The judgment and sentence in this case are affirmed except for the assessment of a public defender’s lien against the defendant. The record does not show that the defendant was advised of his right to a hearing to contest the amount of the hen as required by Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.720(d)(1). See also Smith v. State, 622 So.2d 638 (Fla. 5th DCA 1993). Therefore, the public defender’s lien of $500 is stricken, without prejudice to the reimposition of the lien upon remand after compliance with Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.720(d)(1).

JUDGMENT and SENTENCE AFFIRMED; LIEN QUASHED and REMANDED.

GOSHORN, DIAMANTIS and THOMPSON, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Ashford v. State
652 So. 2d 1195 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1995)
McLeod v. State
645 So. 2d 116 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1994)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
630 So. 2d 230, 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 331, 1994 WL 20084, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/fannin-v-state-fladistctapp-1994.