Fannie Maddux v. Roscoe L. Edwards, Trustee
This text of 185 F.2d 480 (Fannie Maddux v. Roscoe L. Edwards, Trustee) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
This case came on to be heard upon the record and briefs and motion of appellants to be allowed to file reply brief, oral argument having been waived by the parties.
Upon consideration whereof, it is ordered that the motion of appellants for leave to file reply brief be sustained.
It is further ordered that the judgment of the District Court be, and it hereby is, affirmed for the reasons stated in the opinion of the District Court, 94 F.Supp. 134. North v. Puckett, 164 Tenn. 100, 46 S.W.2d 73; Edwards v. Hawks, 189 Tenn. 17, 222 S.W.2d 28.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
185 F.2d 480, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/fannie-maddux-v-roscoe-l-edwards-trustee-ca6-1950.