Fannie Maddux v. Roscoe L. Edwards, Trustee

185 F.2d 480
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit·Decided October 17, 1950·No. 11141_1·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This case came on to be heard upon the record and briefs and motion of appellants to be allowed to file reply brief, oral argument having been waived by the parties.

Upon consideration whereof, it is ordered that the motion of appellants for leave to file reply brief be sustained.

It is further ordered that the judgment of the District Court be, and it hereby is, affirmed for the reasons stated in the opinion of the District Court, 94 F.Supp. 134. North v. Puckett, 164 Tenn. 100, 46 S.W.2d 73; Edwards v. Hawks, 189 Tenn. 17, 222 S.W.2d 28.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Fannie Maddux v. Roscoe L. Edwards, Trustee, 185 F.2d 480 (6th Cir. 1950).

185 F.2d 480 (Fannie Maddux v. Roscoe L. Edwards, Trustee) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

North v. Puckett
46 S.W.2d 73 (Tennessee Supreme Court, 1932)
Edwards v. Hawks
222 S.W.2d 28 (Tennessee Supreme Court, 1949)
In re Maddux
94 F. Supp. 134 (E.D. Tennessee, 1949)