Fann, by Gdn. v. State Highway Dept.

159 S.E. 617, 160 S.C. 156, 1931 S.C. LEXIS 38
CourtSupreme Court of South Carolina
DecidedJune 15, 1931
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 159 S.E. 617 (Fann, by Gdn. v. State Highway Dept.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of South Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Fann, by Gdn. v. State Highway Dept., 159 S.E. 617, 160 S.C. 156, 1931 S.C. LEXIS 38 (S.C. 1931).

Opinion

Order

The appeal in this case was not perfected within the time required by the rules of this Court and by the statutes of the State. The motion of the respondent to dismiss the same was granted by the Circuit Judge. The appellant then sought before this Court permission to perfect the appeal.

*157 Columbia, S. C., June 15, 1931.

On consideration of the grounds for the motion, it appears that the appellant did not comply with the rules and holdings of the Court as announced in the case of Wade v. Gore, 154 S. C., 262, 151 S. E., 470, in that no effort was made to secure from the trial Judge or from a member of this Court an extension of time for perfecting the appeal. Because of this negligence on the part of the appellant, a motion to reinstate the appeal is refused. The Court wishes to reaffirm what we said in Wade v. Gore, supra.

Eugene S. Brease,

Chief Justice.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State v. Cottingham
77 S.E.2d 897 (Supreme Court of South Carolina, 1953)
Brewton v. Inter-Carolinas Motor Bus Co.
166 S.E. 85 (Supreme Court of South Carolina, 1932)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
159 S.E. 617, 160 S.C. 156, 1931 S.C. LEXIS 38, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/fann-by-gdn-v-state-highway-dept-sc-1931.