Fann, by Gdn. v. State Highway Dept.

159 S.E. 617, 160 S.C. 156, 1931 S.C. LEXIS 38
Supreme Court of South Carolina·Decided June 15, 1931·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

Order

The appeal in this case was not perfected within the time required by the rules of this Court and by the statutes of the State. The motion of the respondent to dismiss the same was granted by the Circuit Judge. The appellant then sought before this Court permission to perfect the appeal.

*157 Columbia, S. C., June 15, 1931.

On consideration of the grounds for the motion, it appears that the appellant did not comply with the rules and holdings of the Court as announced in the case of Wade v. Gore, 154 S. C., 262, 151 S. E., 470, in that no effort was made to secure from the trial Judge or from a member of this Court an extension of time for perfecting the appeal. Because of this negligence on the part of the appellant, a motion to reinstate the appeal is refused. The Court wishes to reaffirm what we said in Wade v. Gore, supra.

Eugene S. Brease,

Chief Justice.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Fann, by Gdn. v. State Highway Dept., 159 S.E. 617, 160 S.C. 156, 1931 S.C. LEXIS 38 (S.C. 1931).

159 S.E. 617 (Fann, by Gdn. v. State Highway Dept.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. Cottingham
77 S.E.2d 897 (Supreme Court of South Carolina, 1953)
Brewton v. Inter-Carolinas Motor Bus Co.
166 S.E. 85 (Supreme Court of South Carolina, 1932)