Fankhauser v. Bucyrus Tourism & Visitors Bur.

Ohio Court of Claims·Decided June 24, 2026·No. 2026-00180PQ·Published

Opinion

[Cite as Fankhauser v. Bucyrus Tourism & Visitors Bur., 2026-Ohio-2881.]

IN THE COURT OF CLAIMS OF OHIO

KURT FANKHAUSER Case No. 2026-00180PQ

Requester Judge Lisa L. Sadler

v. JUDGMENT ENTRY

BUCYRUS TOURISM AND VISITORS BUREAU

Respondent

{¶1} In this public-records case, a special master has issued a report and recommendation. The special master recommends that the court: (1) dismiss requester’s complaint for lack of subject-matter jurisdiction, and (2) order requester to bear the costs of this case. {¶2} Neither requester nor respondent has filed timely written objections to the report and recommendation in accordance with R.C. 2743.75(F)(2). Pursuant to R.C. 2743.75(F)(2), if neither party timely objects, then this court “shall promptly issue a final order adopting the report and recommendation, unless it determines that there is an error of law or other defect evident on the face of the report and recommendation.” Upon independent review, the court finds that there is no error of law or other defect evident on the face of the report and recommendation. The court therefore adopts the report and recommendation. {¶3} In accordance with the special master’s recommendations, the court: 1) Dismisses requester’s complaint for lack of subject-matter jurisdiction; and 2) Orders requester to bear the costs of this case. Case No. 2026-00180PQ -2- JUDGMENT ENTRY

{¶4} The clerk shall serve upon all parties notice of this judgment and its date of entry upon the journal.

LISA L. SADLER Judge

Filed June 24, 2026 Sent to S.C. Reporter 7/27/26

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Fankhauser v. Bucyrus Tourism & Visitors Bur., (Ohio Super. Ct. 2026).

Fankhauser v. Bucyrus Tourism & Visitors Bur. (Fankhauser v. Bucyrus Tourism & Visitors Bur.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.