Fancher v. USAA Casualty Insurance Company

CourtDistrict Court, N.D. Mississippi
DecidedApril 1, 2021
Docket4:20-cv-00123
StatusUnknown

This text of Fancher v. USAA Casualty Insurance Company (Fancher v. USAA Casualty Insurance Company) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, N.D. Mississippi primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Fancher v. USAA Casualty Insurance Company, (N.D. Miss. 2021).

Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF MISSISSIPPI GREENVILLE DIVISION

LAUREN FANCHER, et al., CASE NO.: 4:20-cv-00123-SA-JMV Plaintiffs,

v. CHIEF JUDGE SHARION AYCOCK

USAA CASUALTY INSURANCE MAGISTRATE JUDGE COMPANY, et. al, JANE M. VIRDEN

Defendants.

ORDER

This matter is before the court on the opposed Motion to Stay Proceedings [68] filed by Defendant United Services Automobile Association. The matter has been fully briefed, and based thereon, the court finds, as discussed below, that a stay of discovery in this case is warranted pending the earlier of a decision of the pending Motion to Compel Appraisal [26] or September 30, 2021.1 The history of this case has been set out previously in repeated filings. Accordingly, it is not reiterated herein, except to note that this is a putative class action pursuant to FED. R. CIV. P. 23, and as such, discovery as to appropriateness of certification of a class – not discovery on the merits – is the primary concern of the court at this juncture. Amgen Inc. v. Connecticut Retirement Plans and Trust Funds, 568 U.S. 455, 465-66 (2013); see generally 3 NEWBERG ON CLASS ACTIONS § 7:14 (5th ed.). Indeed, the Case Management Order entered in this case [58] reflects that except where unavoidable, only discovery related to the appropriateness of a certified class is permitted and

1 The court will revisit the issue of discovery at that time. merits discovery will not ensue until a ruling has been made on whether a class will be certified. Additionally, given that whether the named Plaintiff will be compelled to appraisal in this case, and if so, that the outcome thereof could have a material effect on Plaintiff’s satisfaction of the prerequisites for class certification, it is the undersigned’s view that proceeding with discovery

about class certification at this juncture is potentially unnecessarily wasteful. SO ORDERED, this the 1st day of April, 2021. /s/ Jane M. Virden UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Fancher v. USAA Casualty Insurance Company, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/fancher-v-usaa-casualty-insurance-company-msnd-2021.