Famular v. Whirlpool Corporation

Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT bece ke SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK i MG rior “a pp OE EAL □□ OURT □□ a □□□ nnn nna rman mmmn □□ nes □□ AP Pry a PU □□□ □□□□ WALT FAMULAR, on behalf of himself and all: Sopa others similarly situated, mS □ 24, 5 Plaintiff, ORDER □□□ □□ A V. 16 CV 944 (VB) WHIRLPOOL CORPORATION, Defendant. : ee ee eee en ee en ees eee es en eee X The Court has received and reviewed the parties’ respective briefs concerning the effect of Chavez v. Occidental Chem. Corp., ---N.Y.3d---, 2020 WL 6136351 (N.Y. Oct. 20, 2020), on the timeliness of plaintiffs claims. Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED that by December 7, 2020, plaintiff shall file a response, not to exceed five pages in length, to defendant’s argument that “[i]n light of Chavez, Plaintiff Famular’s individual claims are timely, but his class claims are not.” (Doc. #142 at 2).

Dated: November 23, 2020 White Plains, NY SO ORDERED:

Vincent L. Briccetti United States District Judge