Famous Amos v. Weil
Opinion
This cause is before us on appeal from the judge of compensation claims’ (JCC) order finding compensability and awarding benefits to appellee Weil. We REVERSE and REMAND with instructions that the JCC address and adjudicate appellants’ Martin v. Carpenter1 defense. Buckhalter v. University of Florida, 411 So.2d 1327 (Fla. 1st DCA), rev. denied, 418 So.2d 1278 (Fla.1982); Westberry v. Copeland Sausage Co., 389 So.2d 1214 (Fla. 1st DCA 1980); Dunn Lumber & Supply Co. v. Roy, 382 So.2d 51 (Fla. 1st DCA), cert, denied, 389 So.2d 1109 (Fla. 1980). We AFFIRM without discussion all [1129]*1129other issues on appeal not involving appellants’ Martin v. Carpenter defense.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
645 So. 2d 1128 (Famous Amos v. Weil) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.