Famous Amos v. Weil

645 So. 2d 1128, 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 12201, 1994 WL 697973
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided December 15, 1994·No. No. 93-3501·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This cause is before us on appeal from the judge of compensation claims’ (JCC) order finding compensability and awarding benefits to appellee Weil. We REVERSE and REMAND with instructions that the JCC address and adjudicate appellants’ Martin v. Carpenter1 defense. Buckhalter v. University of Florida, 411 So.2d 1327 (Fla. 1st DCA), rev. denied, 418 So.2d 1278 (Fla.1982); Westberry v. Copeland Sausage Co., 389 So.2d 1214 (Fla. 1st DCA 1980); Dunn Lumber & Supply Co. v. Roy, 382 So.2d 51 (Fla. 1st DCA), cert, denied, 389 So.2d 1109 (Fla. 1980). We AFFIRM without discussion all [1129]*1129other issues on appeal not involving appellants’ Martin v. Carpenter defense.

BOOTH, WOLF and MICKLE, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Famous Amos v. Weil, 645 So. 2d 1128, 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 12201, 1994 WL 697973 (Fla. Ct. App. 1994).

645 So. 2d 1128 (Famous Amos v. Weil) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Westberry v. Copeland Sausage Co.
389 So. 2d 1214 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1980)
Buckhalter v. University of Florida
411 So. 2d 1327 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1982)
Martin Company v. Carpenter
132 So. 2d 400 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1961)
Dunn Lumber & Supply Co. v. Roy
382 So. 2d 51 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1980)