Family Home Services, Inc. v. Taylor

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Family Home Services, Inc. v. Taylor

236 S.E.2d 28, 142 Ga. App. 386, 1977 Ga. App. LEXIS 1626

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia

DecidedMay 25, 1977

Docket53816

StatusPublished

Cited by5 cases

This text of 236 S.E.2d 28 (Family Home Services, Inc. v. Taylor) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Family Home Services, Inc. v. Taylor, 236 S.E.2d 28, 142 Ga. App. 386, 1977 Ga. App. LEXIS 1626 (Ga. Ct. App. 1977).

Pincite

Opinion

Banke, Judge.

The plaintiffs sued to recover usurious interest allegedly paid to the defendant. The defendant appeals the trial court’s judgment in favor of the plaintiffs contending that it included interest on which the statute of limitation had run.

The note was for the principal sum of $5,692 and called for repayment of a total of $12,354 in monthly installments, all of which had been paid prior to the *387 initiation of this suit. A total of $2,677 was repaid in the twelve months immediately preceding the filing of the suit. The judgment was limited to this amount, one year being the statute of limitation applicable to a claim to recover usurious interest payments. Code § 57-115 (Ga. L. 1875, p. 105); Camp Lumber Co. v. Citizens Bank, 142 Ga. 84, 90 (82 SE 492) (1914). The defendant contends, however, that only a portion of this total is properly allocable to interest, the remainder being payments on principal and, therefore, not recoverable. Code § 57-112 (Ga. L. 1916, p. 48). This contention is without merit. Since the interest was usurious, it was forfeited. Code Ann. § 57-112, supra. Therefore, all money shown to have been paid in excess of the principal amount of the loan and not barred by the statute of limitation is recoverable. Hartsfield Co. v. Willis, 192 Ga. 219 (1) (14 SE2d 735) (1941).

Argued May 9, 1977 Decided May 25, 1977. Richard L. Parker, for appellant. Sidney L. Moore, Jr., for appellees.

Judgment affirmed.

Quillian, P. J., and Shulman, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Banke, Judge.

The plaintiffs sued to recover usurious interest allegedly paid to the defendant. The defendant appeals the trial court’s judgment in favor of the plaintiffs contending that it included interest on which the statute of limitation had run.

The note was for the principal sum of $5,692 and called for repayment of a total of $12,354 in monthly installments, all of which had been paid prior to the *387 initiation of this suit. A total of $2,677 was repaid in the twelve months immediately preceding the filing of the suit. The judgment was limited to this amount, one year being the statute of limitation applicable to a claim to recover usurious interest payments. Code § 57-115 (Ga. L. 1875, p. 105); Camp Lumber Co. v. Citizens Bank, 142 Ga. 84, 90 (82 SE 492) (1914). The defendant contends, however, that only a portion of this total is properly allocable to interest, the remainder being payments on principal and, therefore, not recoverable. Code § 57-112 (Ga. L. 1916, p. 48). This contention is without merit. Since the interest was usurious, it was forfeited. Code Ann. § 57-112, supra. Therefore, all money shown to have been paid in excess of the principal amount of the loan and not barred by the statute of limitation is recoverable. Hartsfield Co. v. Willis, 192 Ga. 219 (1) (14 SE2d 735) (1941).

Argued May 9, 1977 Decided May 25, 1977. Richard L. Parker, for appellant. Sidney L. Moore, Jr., for appellees.

Judgment affirmed.

Quillian, P. J., and Shulman, J., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

236 S.E.2d 28, 142 Ga. App. 386, 1977 Ga. App. LEXIS 1626, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/family-home-services-inc-v-taylor-gactapp-1977.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack