Home/Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York/Family Finance Corp. v. National Surety Corp.

Family Finance Corp. v. National Surety Corp.

180 Misc. 496, 42 N.Y.S.2d 102, 1943 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 1952
CourtAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York
DecidedMay 19, 1943
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 180 Misc. 496 (Family Finance Corp. v. National Surety Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Family Finance Corp. v. National Surety Corp., 180 Misc. 496, 42 N.Y.S.2d 102, 1943 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 1952 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1943).

Opinion

Memorandum: Per Curiam.

A contingent or hypothetical pleading is improper. Such a pleading does not either deny or confess and avoid, as required by statute. (Stroock Plush Co. v. Talcott. 129 App. Div. 14.)

Order modified by granting1 plaintiff’s motion to strike out the first and second defenses in answer, with leave to serve an amended answer within five days after service of order entered hereon, and as modified affirmed, without costs.

Hammer, Shientag and Hecht, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

General Aniline & Film Corp. v. Bayer Co.
113 N.E.2d 844 (New York Court of Appeals, 1953)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
180 Misc. 496, 42 N.Y.S.2d 102, 1943 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 1952, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/family-finance-corp-v-national-surety-corp-nyappterm-1943.