Family Dollar Stores of Florida, Inc. v. Jones

867 So. 2d 1278, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 3750, 2004 WL 574620
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedMarch 24, 2004
DocketNo. 4D03-2465
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 867 So. 2d 1278 (Family Dollar Stores of Florida, Inc. v. Jones) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Family Dollar Stores of Florida, Inc. v. Jones, 867 So. 2d 1278, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 3750, 2004 WL 574620 (Fla. Ct. App. 2004).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Appellant, Family Dollar Stores of Florida, Inc., (“Family Dollar”) appeals the trial court’s final judgment which awarded the Appellee costs. We reverse as to the taxation of costs of a $400 expert witness fee when the witness did not testify at trial and his deposition was not used at trial. See Thellman v. Tropical Acres Steakhouse, Inc., 557 So.2d 683, 684 (Fla. 4th DCA 1900) (stating that “[i]t is not appropriate to tax as costs the fees of witnesses who are neither qualified as experts by the [1279]*1279court nor testify at trial”); Otis Elevator Co. v. Bryan, 489 So.2d 1189,1190-91 (Fla. 1st DCA 1986) (stating that “the taxation of expert witness fees for discovery depositions taken in preparation for trial simply because the attorney says that he used the discovery deposition to prepare for cross examination of the witness at trial” was improper). Furthermore, the Statewide Uniform Guidelines for Taxation of Costs in Civil Actions specifically states that expert witness fees “for the giving of a deposition when the deposition is not used in whole or in part at the trial ... should not be taxed as a cost item.” Reeser v. Boats Unlimited, Inc., 432 So.2d 1346, 1349 n. 2 (Fla. 4th DCA 1983) (containing the administrative order reciting section 2G of the guidelines).

Accordingly, we reverse and remand for proceedings consistent with this opinion. We affirm as to all other issues on appeal.

AFFIRMED in part, REVERSED AND REMANDED in part.

POLEN, MAY, JJ., and DAMOORGIAN, DORIAN K„ Associate Judge, concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Colaizzo v. Office of Criminal Conflict & Civil Regional Counsel
82 So. 3d 195 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2012)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
867 So. 2d 1278, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 3750, 2004 WL 574620, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/family-dollar-stores-of-florida-inc-v-jones-fladistctapp-2004.