Falwell v. Kennedy Krieger Institute
This text of 407 F. App'x 700 (Falwell v. Kennedy Krieger Institute) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Glenda Falwell appeals the district court’s order dismissing her emergency motion for return of child and denying her motion for an extension of time to file proof of legal custody of the minor child. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Falwell v. Kennedy Krieger Inst., No. 1:10-cv-00566-LMB-JFA (E.D.Va. June 23, 2010). We deny Falwell’s motion to amend the caption and grant her motion to amend her informal brief. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
407 F. App'x 700, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/falwell-v-kennedy-krieger-institute-ca4-2011.