Falvy Wilson Co. v. Hughes

11 Teiss. 105, 1914 La. App. LEXIS 16
CourtLouisiana Court of Appeal
DecidedJanuary 26, 1914
DocketNo. 5972
StatusPublished

This text of 11 Teiss. 105 (Falvy Wilson Co. v. Hughes) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Louisiana Court of Appeal primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Falvy Wilson Co. v. Hughes, 11 Teiss. 105, 1914 La. App. LEXIS 16 (La. Ct. App. 1914).

Opinion

His- Honor, EMILE GODOHAUX,

rendered the opinion and decree of the Court, as follows:

Defendant .appeals from a judgment condemning him for the purchase price of certain mantels alleged to have been sold and delivered to him by plaintiff.

Plaintiff’s objection was sustained to. the admission of parole proof tendered by -defendant for the purpose of showing that the goods were sold not to him, but to a third person, the evidence being objected to .on the ground that the transaction is embodied in .a writing, admittedly signed and accepted by defendant, and evidencing a sale to the latter.

The correctness of this ruling is the only matter presented on this appeal.

The document upon which plaintiff relies consists of its ordinary .order or sales sheet upon which is entered in defendant’s name, the character and quantity of the goods ordered a.s well as the price and terms upon which they were sold; and defendant’s acceptance is exhibited [106]*106thereon over Ms own signature. As the document is clear and unambiguous, requiring no evidence to explain or support it, the lower Court properly rejected the parolé testimony offered for the purpose of showing that the sale was made to a party other than defendant, for its effect would be to vary and contradict the terms of the written instrument.

Opinion and decree, January 26, 1914.

Lyons vs. Jackson, 4 Rob., 465; Center vs. Terry, 8 Martin, 206.

It is accordingly ordered that the judgment be affirmed.

Judgment (affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Lyons v. Jackson
4 Rob. 465 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1843)
St. Romes v. Pore
8 Mart. 203 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1821)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
11 Teiss. 105, 1914 La. App. LEXIS 16, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/falvy-wilson-co-v-hughes-lactapp-1914.