Falstone, Inc. v. Commissioner
This text of 65 F. App'x 642 (Falstone, Inc. v. Commissioner) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
MEMORANDUM
Falstone, at all relevant times a Delaware corporation and an inhabitant of the United States Virgin Islands, appeals the judgment of the United States Tax Court. The Tax Court held that there are deficiencies in income tax due from Falstone for taxable years 1984 and 1985 of $42,233 and $80,171 respectively. The case is before us because Falstone’s principal office is now in Nevada. Falstone argues that the 1986 Tax Reform Act’s retroactive requirement that Falstone must pay the IRS tax on its worldwide income was unconstitutional as a retroactive tax, and that targeted exemptions for two other corporations deny it equal protection.
Because Falstone owed the Virgin Islands Bureau of Revenue tax on its worldwide income under the plain language of Section 28(a) of the Revised Organic Act of the Virgin Islands,1 the 1986 Act did not cause a retroactive increase in its tax liability so Congress may require Falstone to instead pay the IRS.2 Further, because the corporations receiving targeted exemptions were still obligated to pay a comparable tax into the treasury of the Virgin Islands,3 no equal protection violation occurred. Sayre & Co. v. Riddell
AFFIRMED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
65 F. App'x 642, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/falstone-inc-v-commissioner-ca9-2003.