Fallschase Development Corp. v. Sheard
726 So. 2d 361, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 806, 1999 WL 52900
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided January 29, 1999·No. No. 97-3789·Published·Cited by 1 cases
Opinion
We affirm the two issues raised on cross-appeal, but reverse on the issue raised on direct appeal, because the legal sufficiency of the third amended complaint had previously been determined when the court ruled on the 1989 motion to dismiss for failure to state a cause of action.
AFFIRMED in part, REVERSED in part and REMANDED for further proceedings.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Fallschase Development Corp. v. Sheard, 726 So. 2d 361, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 806, 1999 WL 52900 (Fla. Ct. App. 1999).
726 So. 2d 361 (Fallschase Development Corp. v. Sheard) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp. v. McKenna
726 So. 2d 361 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1999)