Fallschase Development Corp. v. Sheard
726 So. 2d 361, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 806, 1999 WL 52900
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedJanuary 29, 1999
DocketNo. 97-3789
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases
This text of 726 So. 2d 361 (Fallschase Development Corp. v. Sheard) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Fallschase Development Corp. v. Sheard, 726 So. 2d 361, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 806, 1999 WL 52900 (Fla. Ct. App. 1999).
Opinion
We affirm the two issues raised on cross-appeal, but reverse on the issue raised on direct appeal, because the legal sufficiency of the third amended complaint had previously been determined when the court ruled on the 1989 motion to dismiss for failure to state a cause of action.
AFFIRMED in part, REVERSED in part and REMANDED for further proceedings.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp. v. McKenna
726 So. 2d 361 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1999)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
726 So. 2d 361, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 806, 1999 WL 52900, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/fallschase-development-corp-v-sheard-fladistctapp-1999.