Falls v. . McCulloch

62 N.C. 140
CourtSupreme Court of North Carolina
DecidedJanuary 5, 1867
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 62 N.C. 140 (Falls v. . McCulloch) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Falls v. . McCulloch, 62 N.C. 140 (N.C. 1867).

Opinion

Reabe, J.

The clause of the will upon Avliich the advice of the court is asked is as follows:

“The balance of my property I allow to be sold and my just debts paid. The negroes to be sold at my wife’s death and equally divided among all my children.”

Some of the children died after the testator and in the lifetime of the tenant for life. The question is, was the remainder vested, so that the representatives of the deceased children take.

It is a vested remainder, and the representatives of the deceased children do take.

The doctrine governing this case is settled in the case of Conly v. Kincade, Win. Eq., 44.

Per Curiam.

Decree accordingly.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Kring v. Missouri
107 U.S. 221 (Supreme Court, 1883)
Conly v. . Kincaid
60 N.C. 594 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1864)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
62 N.C. 140, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/falls-v-mcculloch-nc-1867.