Fallkill Construction Co. v. Hudson
This text of 191 A.D. 918 (Fallkill Construction Co. v. Hudson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The affirmative testimony of Stow, that plaintiff lent the 420 feet of cable for use by this digger while engaged on this contract, is not denied by Day, the engineer, although he gives an account of the transaction somewhat different. Therefore, we cannot reject the court’s finding of fact that the cable was so furnished to be afterwards left on the dock at the end of the work. It is admitted that instead of being left on the dock it was taken away after the digger had finished the work. The judgment for its value is, therefore, unanimously affirmed, with costs. Present — Jenks, P. J., Mills, Putnam, Blackmar and Kelly, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
191 A.D. 918, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/fallkill-construction-co-v-hudson-nyappdiv-1920.