Faller v. Scali, McCabe, Sloves, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Faller v. Scali, McCabe, Sloves, Inc.

198 A.D.2d 96, 603 N.Y.S.2d 469

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedNovember 16, 1993

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 198 A.D.2d 96 (Faller v. Scali, McCabe, Sloves, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Faller v. Scali, McCabe, Sloves, Inc., 198 A.D.2d 96, 603 N.Y.S.2d 469 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1993).

Pincite

Opinion

—Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Robert Lippmann, J.), entered April 1, 1993, which denied defendant-appellant’s motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint as against it, unanimously affirmed, without costs. 0

In this action for damages brought by a photographer for the loss of his photo transparencies against the advertising agency that sought to return them by private courier, the IAS Court found a "question of fact involving whether there should have been insurance”. We affirm, but for the different reason that a bailment for hire having been created when the transparencies were initially entrusted to appellant, an issue of fact exists whether appellant failed to exercise reasonable care in safeguarding the property (see, Nierenberg v Wursteria, Inc., 189 AD2d 571, lv denied 82 NY2d 651; Aronette Mfg. Co. v Capitol Piece Dye Works, 6 NY2d 465, 468). Concur — Sullivan, J. P., Carro, Ellerin, Kassal and Nardelli, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Robert Lippmann, J.), entered April 1, 1993, which denied defendant-appellant’s motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint as against it, unanimously affirmed, without costs. 0

In this action for damages brought by a photographer for the loss of his photo transparencies against the advertising agency that sought to return them by private courier, the IAS Court found a "question of fact involving whether there should have been insurance”. We affirm, but for the different reason that a bailment for hire having been created when the transparencies were initially entrusted to appellant, an issue of fact exists whether appellant failed to exercise reasonable care in safeguarding the property (see, Nierenberg v Wursteria, Inc., 189 AD2d 571, lv denied 82 NY2d 651; Aronette Mfg. Co. v Capitol Piece Dye Works, 6 NY2d 465, 468). Concur — Sullivan, J. P., Carro, Ellerin, Kassal and Nardelli, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

198 A.D.2d 96, 603 N.Y.S.2d 469, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/faller-v-scali-mccabe-sloves-inc-nyappdiv-1993.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack