Fall v. Castle Trust Corp

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·Decided July 17, 1996·No. 96-30076·Unpublished

Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

__________________

No. 96-30076 Summary Calendar __________________

CHARLES W. FALL ET AL;

Plaintiffs,

CHARLES W. FALL,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

CASTLE TRUST CORPORATION; PRUDENTIAL SECURITIES, INC.,

Defendants-Appellees.

- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana USDC No. 94-CV-1411 L - - - - - - - - - - May 20, 1996 Before GARWOOD, WIENER and EMILIO M. GARZA, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Nothing in the record in the instant case casts any doubt on

the appropriateness of summary judgment and the correctness of

the district court's dismissal. See Fall v. Castle Trust Corp.,

No. 94-1411 (E.D. La. Nov. 30, 1995); Little v. Liquid Air Corp.,

* Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule 47.5.4. No. 96-30076 -2-

37 F.3d 1069, 1075 (5th Cir. 1994) (en banc). Because the

instant appeal is frivolous, it is dismissed, and all pending

motions are denied as moot. See 5th Cir. R. 42.2.

APPEAL DISMISSED; ALL PENDING MOTIONS DENIED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Fall v. Castle Trust Corp, (5th Cir. 1996).

Fall v. Castle Trust Corp (Fall v. Castle Trust Corp) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.