Falkin v. Kunin

Appellate Court of Illinois

Falkin v. Kunin

204 Ill. App. 484

CourtAppellate Court of Illinois

DecidedMarch 26, 1917

DocketGen. No. 22,749

StatusPublished

This text of 204 Ill. App. 484 (Falkin v. Kunin) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Court of Illinois primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Falkin v. Kunin, 204 Ill. App. 484 (Ill. Ct. App. 1917).

Pincite

Opinion

Mr. Justice Holdom

delivered the opinion of the court.

4. Landlord and tenant, § 437*—when tenant no election as to holding over. Where a tenant holds over for a year or years after his term expires without any new agreement, the landlord may at his election treat such tenant as a trespasser or as a tenant for another year on the same terms as in the original lease, but the tenant has no such election. 5. Forcible entry and detainer, § 31*—when demand for possession unnecessary. No demand for possession is necessary before bringing an action of forcible detainer against a tenant holding over after expiration of the term specified in his lease.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Mr. Justice Holdom

delivered the opinion of the court.

4. Landlord and tenant, § 437*—when tenant no election as to holding over. Where a tenant holds over for a year or years after his term expires without any new agreement, the landlord may at his election treat such tenant as a trespasser or as a tenant for another year on the same terms as in the original lease, but the tenant has no such election. 5. Forcible entry and detainer, § 31*—when demand for possession unnecessary. No demand for possession is necessary before bringing an action of forcible detainer against a tenant holding over after expiration of the term specified in his lease.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

204 Ill. App. 484, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/falkin-v-kunin-illappct-1917.