Falk v. Triborough Bridge Authority

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Falk v. Triborough Bridge Authority

257 A.D. 851, 12 N.Y.S.2d 1015, 1939 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8160

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMay 23, 1939

StatusPublished

This text of 257 A.D. 851 (Falk v. Triborough Bridge Authority) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Falk v. Triborough Bridge Authority, 257 A.D. 851, 12 N.Y.S.2d 1015, 1939 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8160 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1939).

Pincite

Opinion

Action brought by the plaintiff, assignee of the claim of Max Hoehman, to recover damages for the conversion by the defendant of certain salvage material. Order granting defendant’s motion for summary judgment, and judgment entered thereon dismissing the complaint, unanimously affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. No opinion. Present — Lazansky, P. J., Johnston, Adel, Taylor and Close, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Action brought by the plaintiff, assignee of the claim of Max Hoehman, to recover damages for the conversion by the defendant of certain salvage material. Order granting defendant’s motion for summary judgment, and judgment entered thereon dismissing the complaint, unanimously affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. No opinion. Present — Lazansky, P. J., Johnston, Adel, Taylor and Close, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

257 A.D. 851, 12 N.Y.S.2d 1015, 1939 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8160, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/falk-v-triborough-bridge-authority-nyappdiv-1939.