Falk v. Starr

31 Misc. 756, 64 N.Y.S. 1135
Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York·Decided April 15, 1900·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Per Ouriam.

We think this case was correctly disposed of by the court below on the authority of Bemheimer v. Herraran, 44 Hun, 110, decided in this department, and which, for that reason, we should follow, rather than Sage v. Burton, 84 Hun, 267, elsewhere decided by a divided court.

Present: Beekman, P. J., Giegerich and O’Gorman, JJ.

Judgment affirmed, with costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Falk v. Starr, 31 Misc. 756, 64 N.Y.S. 1135 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1900).

31 Misc. 756 (Falk v. Starr) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Hutzler v. Hertz Corp.
347 N.E.2d 627 (New York Court of Appeals, 1976)
Szwento Juozupo Let Draugystes v. Manhattan Savings Institution
178 A.D. 57 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1917)