Falk v. R. R. Appleton Co.

City of New York Municipal Court

Falk v. R. R. Appleton Co.

31 Misc. 807, 62 N.Y.S. 1136

DecidedMarch 15, 1900

StatusPublished

This text of 31 Misc. 807 (Falk v. R. R. Appleton Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering City of New York Municipal Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Falk v. R. R. Appleton Co., 31 Misc. 807, 62 N.Y.S. 1136 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1900).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The proof offered of the written assignment was competent, bnt even without that proof there was sufficient evidence in the case of the assignment without regard to the written instrument, and it was for the alleged failure of this proof that the complaint was dismissed. This was error, Which requires that the judgment be reversed.

Present: Eitzsimons, Oh. J., Oonlan and O’Dwyeb, JJ.

Judgment reversed, and new trial ordered, with costs to appellant to abide event.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

The proof offered of the written assignment was competent, bnt even without that proof there was sufficient evidence in the case of the assignment without regard to the written instrument, and it was for the alleged failure of this proof that the complaint was dismissed. This was error, Which requires that the judgment be reversed.

Present: Eitzsimons, Oh. J., Oonlan and O’Dwyeb, JJ.

Judgment reversed, and new trial ordered, with costs to appellant to abide event.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

31 Misc. 807, 62 N.Y.S. 1136, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/falk-v-r-r-appleton-co-nynyccityct-1900.