Falk v. Mae

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Falk v. Mae

769 S.E.2d 625, 367 N.C. 487

CourtSupreme Court of North Carolina

DecidedApril 10, 2014

DocketNo. 197P13

StatusPublished

This text of 769 S.E.2d 625 (Falk v. Mae) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Falk v. Mae, 769 S.E.2d 625, 367 N.C. 487 (N.C. 2014).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

The Notice of Appeal filed by defendant and third-party plaintiff (Fannie Mae) and defendant (GlassRatner Management & Realty Advisors, [488]*488LLC) is RETAINED. Their Petition for Discretionary Review is ALLOWED. Plaintiff and third-party defendant’s (Michael A. Falk) Motion to Dismiss Appeal is DENIED.

By order of the Court in Conference, this the 10th day of April 2014.

In addition, the parties are directed to address the applicability, if any, of N.C.G.S. § 45-37(b) (1991) and N.C.G.S. § 45-37(b) (2011) to this case.

s/Beaslev. J.

For the Court

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

The Notice of Appeal filed by defendant and third-party plaintiff (Fannie Mae) and defendant (GlassRatner Management & Realty Advisors, [488]*488LLC) is RETAINED. Their Petition for Discretionary Review is ALLOWED. Plaintiff and third-party defendant’s (Michael A. Falk) Motion to Dismiss Appeal is DENIED.

By order of the Court in Conference, this the 10th day of April 2014.

In addition, the parties are directed to address the applicability, if any, of N.C.G.S. § 45-37(b) (1991) and N.C.G.S. § 45-37(b) (2011) to this case.

s/Beaslev. J.

For the Court

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

769 S.E.2d 625, 367 N.C. 487, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/falk-v-mae-nc-2014.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack