Falk v. Mae

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Falk v. Mae

769 S.E.2d 625, 367 N.C. 487

Supreme Court of North Carolina·Decided April 10, 2014·No. No. 197P13·Published

Opinion

ORDER

The Notice of Appeal filed by defendant and third-party plaintiff (Fannie Mae) and defendant (GlassRatner Management & Realty Advisors, [488] LLC) is RETAINED. Their Petition for Discretionary Review is ALLOWED. Plaintiff and third-party defendant’s (Michael A. Falk) Motion to Dismiss Appeal is DENIED.

By order of the Court in Conference, this the 10th day of April 2014.

In addition, the parties are directed to address the applicability, if any, of N.C.G.S. § 45-37(b) (1991) and N.C.G.S. § 45-37(b) (2011) to this case.

s/Beaslev. J.

For the Court

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

The Notice of Appeal filed by defendant and third-party plaintiff (Fannie Mae) and defendant (GlassRatner Management & Realty Advisors, [488] LLC) is RETAINED. Their Petition for Discretionary Review is ALLOWED. Plaintiff and third-party defendant’s (Michael A. Falk) Motion to Dismiss Appeal is DENIED.

By order of the Court in Conference, this the 10th day of April 2014.

In addition, the parties are directed to address the applicability, if any, of N.C.G.S. § 45-37(b) (1991) and N.C.G.S. § 45-37(b) (2011) to this case.

s/Beaslev. J.

For the Court

Falk v. Mae, 769 S.E.2d 625, 367 N.C. 487 (N.C. 2014).

Pincite

769 S.E.2d 625 (Falk v. Mae) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related